Every
2 - 3 years BoardSource conducts an in depth survey and publishes The
Nonprofit Governance Index. This important report helps us understand how
nonprofits govern, benchmark our
organization and Board to others, and provides updates in trends and
recommendations by BoardSource. My
articles about the Nonprofit Governance Index are always popular – and enduring
long after they are published. As always
I mix in my commentary along with the objective results – so please don’t blame
BoardSource which has diligently reported the data objectively.
Today I am publishing two articles on the 2012 Nonprofit Governance index. This article covers:
- Board Policies and Practices
- Board Performance
The companion piece at the Nonprofit Capacity Building blog at managementhelp.org covers
- Organizational Characteristics
- CEO Characteristics
- Board Composition and Structure
1341 nonprofit CEOs from across the
country completed a detailed questionnaire with multiple choice and open ended
questions – 66 questions in total.
Large, medium and small sized organizations are fairly represented
across all nonprofit sectors. The median budget size was in the $1 - $5 Million
range.
So here are the results of all this:
Board Policies
and Practices
Adoption of accountability measures
has continued to increase since the revision of IRS Form 990, which began
requiring disclosure of governance policies in 2009. 96% now have conflict of
interest policies and 88% have whistleblower and documentation retention and
destruction policies. 81% of boards have
a formal written evaluation of their CEO and provide 990s to Board members
before filing. This represents significant
progress with accountability by Boards on these
important responsibilities.
Boards are definitely taking their responsibilities more seriously than
in the past.
44% of nonprofit Boards meet 4-6 times
a year and also 7-12 times a year. It’s
a dead heat. I am often asked how often
is most common and I always say that I have seen every frequency. This data bears that out. What is also true is that if there are fewer
meetings the meetings are longer. Boards
reported spending 35% of their time on committee or staff reports and 38% on strategy and policy issues rather than
operational issues. 88% of Boards report
75% attendance at meetings or better.
Sounds great but I think they are counting more tele and video
conferencing than in the past since 47% say they use these technologies.
55% of the respondents
report that they have conducted a formal self-assessment in the past three
years, but nearly 30% of respondents report that their Board has never conducted
a formal, written evaluation of its own performance. When I am contacted in the early stages of Board
Retreat planning, I frequently recommend conducting a Board Assessment and I
have an excellent tool for conducting an assessment. I am surprised that so many Boards don’t
consider this an important thing to do.
ALL of the organizations that I have done an assessment with have found
it helpful and it provides an excellent springboard for discussion on how Board
performance can improve. If you haven’t
done a board assessment, seriously consider it.
Board
Fundraising
75% CEOs report 90% to 100% personal board
giving. This is good news. However, while 75% of CEOs say that
expectations regarding fundraising are explained during recruitment, 40% of nonprofit CEOs report that their board
members remain reluctant to participate in fundraising activities. CEOs identify fundraising as the most common
area needed for board improvement, and fundraising is consistently the lowest
scoring area on the board report card. I
have seldom met a nonprofit CEO that does not have this complaint. But frankly
– no egg throwing now – I think the expectation in small - especially urban based - nonprofits is frequently unrealistic.
Board Orientation
This chart clearly shows the value of having formal Board
orientation. Boards that do report
having a structured orientation report having significantly more well informed
boards. It does make a difference.
Board Responsibilities
BoardSource asked CEOs to assess their Board’s performance in the responsibilities
outlined in the BoardSource publication, Ten Basic Responsibilities of
Nonprofit Boards. Over 80% of CEOs rated their Boards as having a grade of A or B in their
understanding of the organization’s mission and financial oversight. From there the grading goes down rather
precipitously. Once again, as in past surveys, boards received a low grade for
fundraising. In fact 45% of CEOs gave their Board a D or F in fundraising. Not very encouraging.
No comments:
Post a Comment